Blur’s Think Tank

blurReview: A+
First off, I have to say that Blur was my favorite band when I was in High School in the mid-90s. I’ll con­fess that, back then, I had a case of exag­ger­ated anglophilia, only fed by the band’s ironic lyrics, “la la las”, and quirky compositions.

But that was then.

Since the days of Park­life and The Great Escape, I’ve real­ized that Eng­land really does have an inflated impres­sion of their cul­tural importance… uh, wait, that’s France. I’m an Amer­i­can, so I needn’t be walk­ing around in Fred Perry shirts and keep­ing up on the latest & great­est new band. Truth be told, and hype aside, the major­ity of British bands are pretty mediocre. In con­trast, there are hun­dreds of truly excep­tional Amer­i­can bands that barely ever get noticed. <insert your favorite here>

Which brings me to the new Blur album, Think Tank, of which I’ve received an advance copy, (avail­able in record stores May 5). There have been con­flict­ing reports about the release, so I thought that I’d just take a minute to dispel some rumors:

  1. 1. It’s a dance album. Not really. It cer­tainly has more of a “pop” feel, but that’s noth­ing new for the band.
  2. 2. It’s a world music album. Not really. The Moroc­can and West African influ­ences are accom­pa­ni­ments, and they’re fully processed and inte­grated into the mix. It fully sounds like a 21st cen­tury LP.
  3. 3. Blur sucks with­out Graham. Ok, firing your gui­tarist, espe­cially when he’s as bril­liant as Graham, is tough. But the songs don’t really suffer. Besides, he appears on one track.
  4. 4. This is Goril­laz, Part II. Hell no. Goril­laz was fun. But, on this LP, Damon’s lyrics and vocal deliv­ery is straight for­ward, in the first-​person, with­out pre­tend­ing to be some­one he’s not.

So what of the new LP? It’s the most con­sis­tently good album of theirs since Park­life. Part elec­tronic, part folk, & part Bacharach… with a few rock­ers to sat­isfy the Song 2 crowd. It’s real roman­tic stuff, with­out being irritating.

And the video for the first single uses doc­u­men­tary footage of a female US Marine, on duty in the Per­sian Gulf.

A very good record, indeed.

68 Responses to “Blur’s Think Tank”


  • Watch it Noddy / Neddy, what­ever, that’s the sub-​editor of Dazed and Con­fused you’re talk­ing about there. Not some Amer­i­can random who pro­duces a web­site ded­i­cated to his own opin­ions.
    Now I’m not taking sides here, but its quite appar­ent that this whole argu­ment has devel­oped from not lis­ten­ing to each other, and both having opin­ions that you want the other person to refute, so you can call them big­oted and ill-​informed.
    You’re both well informed, and though you have the facts and fig­ures, you haven’t expe­ri­enced each other’s sit­u­a­tions at all so this argu­ment has degen­er­ated into name-​calling.
    I doubt that makes sense, but I was out late yes­ter­day watch­ing a band called Hot Hot Heat who are Cana­dian and fuck­ing rock. They were sup­ported also by Har Mar Super­star who is always good for a laugh. This is the kind of music people should be get­ting behind, new music that deserves the atten­tion, whether its British, Amer­i­can or any­thing else.
    My inter­est in Think Tank lies mainly in the art­work, pro­duced by Banksy, as I haven’t yet heard much of the album. I’m sure it’ll be quite inter­est­ing to listen to, but won’t stand out much.

  • Olly, nice lap dog you make. Alex is as much a jour­nal­ist as Pres­i­dent Bush is eloquent.

    Read­ing some Amer­i­can music mag­a­zine reviews, THINK TANK got some good reviews:

    Rolling Stone: 4 stars
     Spin: A

    And they both say prac­ti­cally the same thing I did… that Blur is dif­fer­ent with­out Graham Coxon, but that Damon is the essen­tial part of the band, and the record doesn’t suffer with­out Coxon’s input.

    But, go see for your­self. The album comes out tomor­row, May 6.

  • gives

    a

    fuck

  • I think Blur needs needs a restrain­ing order issued against their instru­ments after this album. In fact, it is so hor­ri­ble the next one should be free. I can’t get into it.

    The tides between the UK and US roll between each other every 7-10 years. In the early 90′s it was grunge. Mid-​late 90s it was rock/pop blur, oasis, etc. Now it is the White Stripes, Inter­pol, etc.

  • I can’t say enough about the art direc­tion by Banksy. Truly top notch.

    And, in the spe­cial edi­tion CD, we’re treated to pages and pages of Damon’s ama­teur­ish doo­dles and lyric sheets. Fas­ci­nat­ing – espe­cially “Sweet Song”, which has some more per­sonal lines (about Graham?) that weren’t used in the final lyric.

  • More pos­i­tive press clippings:

    Guardian reviews Blur LIVE at the Asto­ria, London: 5 Stars

    Time Mag­a­zine‘s review:

    “The open­ing track, Ambu­lance ? which would sit easily on David Bowie’s Low ? begins with a dec­la­ra­tion: “I ain’t got noth­ing to be scared of.” And Albarn does seem musi­cally fear­less. Think Tank is often exper­i­men­tal but never jar­ring, mixing synth and acoustic picking.”

    New York News­day on “Think Tank”:

    “‘Think Tank’ is Blur’s best album since its debut ‘Leisure,’ brim­ming with new ideas and bun­dles of energy tem­pered by Albarn’s grow­ing musi­cal knowledge.”

    The BBC raves:

    “Would Think Tank be any good? …the answer is yes. Think Tank… sounds utterly con­fi­dent, sure-​footed, and, in some ways, defi­ant. “

    Mel­bourne Herald Sun gets catty (which I don’t condone):

    “Not being on “Think Tank” is Coxon’s loss. Albarn hasn’t had to point out it’s Blur’s best album; the media are doing it for him.”

  • but graham wasn’t on crazy beat…..so i would apol­o­gise to your girl­friend if i were you :p

  • Easy for you to say, now… heh… :-D

    I was just guess­ing, on my ear. It appears, I was wrong about that.

  • I’M LISTENING….I GOT NO A OPIN­ION YET…BUT I LIKE IT….IT SOUNDS STRANGE…
    AMBU­LANCE IS A JEWEL
    BUT IN A FEW MONTHS…..I’LL SAY EXACTLY WHATWANNA SAY

  • Thanks Ned, all’s fine in the mental insti­tu­tion. Don’t get day­light much but the food’s great, well it is ever since they took my teeth out so I can’t chew it. I caught the bullet points, and although I’m sure you know what letter comes after H, let me point it out again. It’s I. As in, ‘I tire of your point­less sabre rattling.’

    It’s obvi­ously been pointed out that Murdoch’s aus­tralian, and lives in the US mainly due to restric­tions of cross media own­er­ship. Not a prob­lem in the US. And why should “Liberal” people refrain from reac­tionary name-​calling? As for free speech, you were the first to ‘Write it down’ not invent it. And you read the Guardian, wow it’s like a reg­u­lar left wing party over there isn’t it. Bar the morals, of course. And if you are so pissed at this dis­cus­sion why are you both­er­ing to reply, and you crack me up the way you always put ‘Why do i always enter into these dicussions’ like some bemused come­dian. Nobody’s lis­ten­ing chief.

    As for the uni­ver­sity stuff, no idea what you mean really. I didn’t get my degree at Oxford or Cam­bridge, it has made little dif­fer­ence to my life so far. But i’ll keep you posted. I don’t think i have to point out that some of the most dan­ger­ous people in the world have been edu­cated at oxford, har­vard, etc… And sorry to point this out but if you ded­i­cate a web­site to your views, don’t get tetchy when people reply with their own opin­ion. Or just take the site off the web all together. Either way, everyone’s happy.

    I do read your posts ned, the prob­lem is they’re invari­ably bollocks.

  • Now that’s what Free­dom of Speech is… Dufus.

  • just stum­bled across this page, and to be honest, was quite impressed by what i’ve seen. what started off as a few hap­haz­ard com­ments about a good album has sparked into quite an inter­est­ing con­ver­sa­tion, which is, let’s face it, far more interesting.

    i am a brit, and whilst cur­rently despis­ing the amer­i­can for­eign policy and the atti­tudes and arro­gance of the US estab­lish­ment, i do not feel it is fair to hold all amer­i­cans respon­si­ble. tony blair is not exactly a states­man to be proud of, seeing as he is simply a war-​mongering, pan­der­ing lap-​dog to bush. he may be rather more elo­quent, but per­haps this serves only to make him more dangerous.

    i also have to point out that at first i was a little dis­ap­pointed by the turnout for the NY demon­stra­tion, i then realised upon fur­ther thought that the main reason for this is that whilst amer­ica is much larger coun­try (both in pop­u­la­tion and area) it is far more sparsely pop­u­lated. in the uk people trav­elled from the north and south­west to take part, but remem­ber that eng­land is the same size as new york state, so a com­par­i­son is not really valid.

    i imag­ine that there is mass apathy in the US, but the same exists here (look at the turnout of the last local elections!).

    onto the music thing, i feel that it is wrong to accuse amer­i­cans of just turn­ing out shit bands such as limp bizkit et al, when there is a thriv­ing under­ground of inter­est­ing artists and projects, just as there is here in the uk. most amer­i­can mate­r­ial in the charts is, indeed, shit, but all the good stuff is avail­able to buy over here. all this sug­gests is that it is the record buying public that have no taste when they rush out to buy slip­knot albums in their thou­sands, but sonic youth and tor­toise LPs can only limp into the top 100 if they’re lucky.

    i work for a small but very well respected inde­pen­dent label in london who receive rave reviews across the world, but still strug­gle to sell a couple of thou­sand albums (aside from our last release which did rather well).

    per­haps who we should be blam­ing is the playlis­ters at radio 1 and co, who pro­gram shit all day long, and hence ensure the charts are packed with the same banal crap. sure, we have bas­tions of hope like mr peel (and res­o­nance fm, but let’s face it, how many people listen to it). i don’t feel it’s fair to blame a nation for shoddy musi­cal output, when the only reason it’s pop­u­lar here is because it is the UK res­i­dents who are buying it. to be fair, much of the UK’s exported music is pretty damned embar­rass­ing (robbie williams, cold­play, oasis, the stereo-​fucking phonics…i could go on for days).

    anyway, besides all that, on the way to the club is think tank’s stand out track.

    cheers
     olli

  • One ques­tion. Why are the british charts so pol­luted with man­u­fac­tured rub­bish pro­duced in Britain? Answer: to com­pete with the man­u­fac­tured rub­bish pro­duced in Amer­ica pro­duced for our charts. It’s all very well being diplo­matic olli, but as we’ve seen recently… diplo­macy gets you nowhere. We are second in the chain of con­sump­tion when it comes to Amer­i­can pop music. We rep­re­sent a crit­i­cal mile­stone rather than a sales one. But all the same, major US bands/singers are flooded into the British market and it affects young talent here. No ques­tion.
    Unfor­tu­nately Olli, I think Amer­ica has a lot to answer for. An out­wardly aggres­sive, arro­gant policy to toward for­eign states should be responded to with aggres­sive, arro­gant argu­ments against. What was left of a left wing in Amer­ica has died on its arse largely due to the apathy and wet­ness. The facts stand that the right wing has a much better PR machine than the left. It’s market forces and ideals that are the centre of modern pol­i­tics now ? and Amer­ica is def­i­nitely to blame for that. As for the turnouts at marches, it’s a geo­graph­i­cal ideal but it doesn’t ring true morally. It was just a shit turnout.

    Yeh, we are a lap dog to Bush. We have little choice. Increas­ingly inde­ci­sive about Europe, need­ing mil­i­tary pro­tec­tion we have nowhere else to turn. You could see in Blair’s eyes he knew Iraq was the wrong move… but what could he do? You saw the threat of sanc­tions against France after GW2. You’re damned if you do and damned if you don’t. The only reason I got pissed with little Neddy here is because he’s argu­ments are flawed and frankly pretty naive.

    So If you want to call me ‘reactionary’ toward amer­ica at the moment then fine. I think they deserve it. And I mean that as a country… whole­sale. Vote him out and do some­thing useful or shut up. And stop pre­tend­ing that he didn’t win 60 odd per­cent of the vote. the pres­i­dent is your ambas­sador to the world – you do the maths.

    As for music, you’re british olli. Deep down you agree with me even if you can’t admit it in type… ha ha…

  • I seri­ously dig Blur’s new album. Anyway, I saw them at the Las Vegas show and it was fan­tas­tic! What a great experience!

  • Have bought every Blur album ever but really pissed as my com­puter is my music centre, are the band and the record com­pany that stupid they don?t real­ize that buy sell­ing albums that wont play on cd drives the fans will be retun­ing albums to shops and never buying any­thing from the band again. I per­son­ally always buy music rather than down­load cause i like the art­work, lyrics etc and to lazy to learn how to dl it. How­ever if as it appears there is no way for me to play this album on my comp, the album is going back to the shop and from now on ille­gal DL”s for all my blur needs. Great job on alien­at­ing fans and turn­ing what could be the album which gives you the main­stream suc­cess in Amer­ica you pre­tend not to want(despite the tours) instead into the album that will lose you loyal fans that have been with you from the start. Did the fact about one in four people now use their comp as music centre and that many of these people myself included no longer own a stereo/hifl system or can afford to own one not cross their minds?, not even a mes­sage on cover like wont play on cd drives… plus the 3 minute film you get instead of the album when played on comp absolutely SUCKS…..ahh that?s better had to get that out. If I am wrong and the album can be played on comp and I am doing some­thing wrong some­body please let me know but I don?t think this is the case

  • Found this site when look­ing for info on blur cd prob­lem must say Alex/Ned spat is great to read at 4am stoned. Anyway here is my badly writ­ten pen­nies worth (Alex note I am point­ing out my bad gram­mar and punc­tu­a­tion now before you do) which reminds me one of the main rea­sons for my poor Eng­lish is that it should not be my nat­ural lan­guage but it is because your coun­try while ruling my coun­try Ire­land impris­oned and mur­dered people for speak­ing or learn­ing their native tongue Gaelic. So climb done of your high horse as Eng­land com­mit­ted unspeak­able atroc­i­ties for the cause of empire (Ire­land and India are exam­ples any third party reader can easily find out about) but most Eng­lish people don?t know it or do not want to acknowl­edge it and still talk about the good old days of the glo­ri­ous empire ha-​ha. This men­tal­ity still exists today in rela­tion to North­ern Ire­land Bloody Sunday and the recent BBC Panorama show about col­lu­sion between British army and Loy­al­ist murder gangs mur­der­ing inno­cent people are exam­ples of this. Anyway went a bit off track there but that seems to be the norm here. Back on the sub­ject of the US debate going on I have a good under­stand­ing of both sides as I am from Alex?s side of the pond but cur­rently living in Boston Mass­a­chu­setts. The state­ment above was done to prove a point that it is very easy to blame an indi­vid­ual in this case Ned for the actions of a leader of their coun­try, using Alex?s logic Alex is respon­si­ble for what his coun­try has done and con­tin­ues to do in my land so if Alex wants to know what Ned is doing about Bush then equally I want to know what he is doing about above. So while I agree totally with Alex on Iraq, Amer­i­can for­eign policy and impos­ing ones cul­ture on others, he should remem­ber the saying people in glasshouses. To cor­rect an ear­lier igno­rant post bush actu­ally did not get 60% of the vote as claimed and actu­ally got less votes than gore. The rea­sons he is in power are as fol­lows. The Elec­toral Col­lege system that gives states with more cows than people same power as metrop­o­lis states like NY or Cal­i­for­nia. plus a mis­guided Jewish back­lash in Florida against Clinton/Gore Israeli poli­cies which made the cru­cial dif­fer­ence and a right wing major­ity on the supreme court which cemented him in power. While on the sub­ject of igno­rance, Amer­i­can politi­cians where referred to as their MP equiv­a­lents, umm a non igno­rant person would know mem­bers off US upper par­lia­ment are called con­gress­men. How­ever I find all of what Alex says about Amer­i­can media true and the aver­age Amer­i­can needs to real­ize that the likes of Murdoch?s fox news are just right wing pro­pa­ganda in the same vein as Iraqi state TV and that jour­nal­ists are not sup­posed to tell the news with a slant but from a third party per­spec­tive giving unbi­ased cov­er­age off all sides opin­ions and then should let the people decide for them­selves good exam­ples of this being the BBC and Canal +. This neu­tral report­ing is miss­ing in USA and has been since Amer­ica licked its wounds after Viet­nam and was badly miss­ing during build up to Iraq espe­cially in Un/France spat where they fed the public the untrue view France was pro Saddam for­get­ting they where first to commit troops in first Iraq war and in action in Afghanistan. In real­ity France just trusted their intel­li­gence on Iraqi weapons of mass destruc­tion more than Amer­i­cas as France has a high Arab pop­u­la­tion and had done a better job at infil­trat­ing Iraqi system. I how­ever think Ned knows this and would like his fellow coun­try­men to as well so abus­ing him wont solve igno­rance on this issue and gen­eral Amer­i­can igno­rance on world issues and their role in the world, plus because people believe what they see on the news aver­age Joe Bloggs in US does not real­ize they are being misled with c span being the only neu­tral war cov­er­age we had here. If more Amer­i­cans knew they where not always get­ting the full story and that Amer­i­can sta­tions where trying to hard to be more patri­otic than their com­peti­tors at expense of fair report­ing you would see a dif­fer­ent out­look on things as I have seen in my flat mates here who watch the BBC news on inter­net with me every night. So blame the right wing silent take over off power here not the people who don?t real­ize it has hap­pened and just be grate­ful for being lucky enough to have the inde­pen­dently minded BBC who set the bench­mark for fair broad­cast­ing in Britain with­out them Alex I fear our side off the waters media would slide to the right to and you would not be able to get all worked up as you also would lack knowl­edge of world affairs and other cul­tures like so many here?..more to say but off to bed hope Alex under­stands better why people here have views they have and hope Ned and other Amer­i­cans can see thought the fog and take back their media and gov­ern­ment from far far right and big busi­ness inter­ests where major com­pa­nies like Mon­santo, oil com­pa­nies and arms man­u­fac­tur­ers basi­cally get to decide policy in return for bank ruling elec­tion cam­paigns usu­ally to the detri­ment of ordi­nary Amer­i­cans, the world and the planet we live on?..(before anyone points it out the first part of post the blur rant has been cut and pasted into blur offi­cial web­site as well

  • nismokeysean, that has to be the fun­ni­est thing I have read in a long time – i wish more stoned people at 4am would com­ment on pol­i­tics, cul­ture, and media…

    at least you under­stand the dif­fer­ence between an indi­vid­ual and a gov­ern­ment – espe­cially when the indi­vid­ual is doing his best in the opposition.

    As I said, I prob­a­bly agreed with a lot of what Alex said, except for his irra­tional anti-​American tirades.

    Why should I have to be ashamed of being Amer­i­can? Who gets to decide what “American” means, anyway? I’d rather define my own mean­ing of the word, and I don’t want Mr. Bush speak­ing for me.

  • Northern Ire­land is surely whole new world of shit though. Started by the british and then, funded by, er, those crazy Yanks! (they get every­where) As for the empire build­ing of GB, that was dare I say quite a few years ago. And not that I con­done it, but things were slightly dif­fer­ent then Sean. You know, about the same time the Death Penalty was still legal in the UK, and still is in the US! I took a dis­lik­ing to Ed because of his psuedo-​academic ram­blings that have given friends I’ve told about it quite a laugh. My point in all of these quotes was: It is about time that they realised the amount of anti-​US sen­ti­ment that has been cre­ated in the rest of the world. And Ned’s rea­son­ing that “Bush doesn’t speak for me” frankly doesn’t wash. Tony Blair speaks for me because he’s the face of Great Britain in terms of pol­i­tics. I might not agree but he’s demo­c­ra­t­i­cally elected. The amount of pain, anguish and let’s face it… death they’re caus­ing in the name of West­ern ideals. They have opened up pos­si­bly one of the worst con­flicts in an already demol­ished region, and caused one of the biggest polit­i­cal inquiries in british polit­i­cal his­tory since Pro­fumo. They’ve split the U.N, ignored NATo, offended China, ditched Kyoto, passed leg­is­la­tion to drill for oil in pro­tected land in the North, kept numer­ous people in Guan­tanamo Bay with­out trial or expla­na­tion, reignited the Israel/palestine fued, opened the first Burger King in Bagdhad air­port, ignored the plight in Liberia (cos let’s face it, there’s no fuck­ing oil there), installed a comedic, puppet gov­ern­ment in Iraq, com­pletely screwed the polic­ing process in Iraq… I mean the list is end­less. Ignore what I say, just look at the facts. They’re all true. And now, after all that, there’s talk of re-​electing the twat. Suck­ahs for punishment?

Comments are currently closed.