{ column_width:57, column_count:13, subcolumn_count:0, column_gutter:17, align:'left' }

Archive for September, 2003

Sales Adjustments in IT

WorldmachineRandomly browsing the web today, I found that the web shop I worked for in downtown Boston during the waning days of the internet boom, Worldmachine, appears to be back in business.

It was just about two years ago that they called all of us into the conference room to announce layoffs and that they were shutting the company down. The obvious reason given at the time, was lack of new sales.

This I still find interesting, because the excuse all sales professionals seem to offer in this dreadful economy is that the sales cycle is much longer—sometimes 18 months or more. At my new company, a company which focuses on localization and testing, my co-workers and I were treated to a sales presentation recently, in which the same kinds of excuses were offered.

Unlike Worldmachine’s woefully understaffed Sales dept., however, this team seems to be adjusting to the “new” New Economy. They’ve accepted that the IT market is a shirking pie, and that price competition is getting too cutthroat. Instead, they are looking to new verticals for growth.

In Boston, the Bio-tech boom is providing a new market in the life sciences. As drug manufacturers look to market their products overseas, partnering with a top localization firm is going to be critical. The planet’s population is only going to get older.

An interesting theory our Sales team is going to try, is to group their teams by vertical, rather than by location. Though it may have made sense a few years ago to send your Tokyo team to Hong Kong clients, and your California team to clients in Los Angeles, the reality of a long sales cycle and a need to patiently educate clients is forcing a reconsideration. Sales needs to educate themselves first—and to do that, they need more involvement from production and operations people. People like me.

The good news is, we are profitable, and I’m confident that the company I’m part of now is on sound footing. I wasn’t at all confident of that in September 2001.

<ul>s and <li>s in CSS

I hope someone can help me with this CSS problem / bug:

<ul> and <li> are defined as such:

ul {
margin:.5em 0 1em;
padding:0;
list-style-type:none;}

ul li {
background:url(”/img/bullet.gif”) no-repeat 11px .7em;
margin:0;
padding:0 0 2px 18px;
line-height:1.5em; }

But, in Firebird for the PC, I get an undesdesirable “second” bullet on a:hover:

An illustration of the Mozilla Bug

No other browser seems to do this, though I haven’t been able to test a mozilla browser on a Mac. Is it a bug? Or is there a hack that would fix it?

Verizon’s UI, Part II

An update on my Verizon annoyances– After a few weeks of assurances and passing the buck, I’ve been told that we won’t be able to get DSL for our new house. No discernible reason was given, just a “no”.

So, to put my money where my mouth was, I decided to punish Verizon for this by switching our phone to Comcast.

All this supposedly “good” deregulation in the communications industry still leaves those of us in Boston with little choice. Since we’re already going to pay Comcast for cable tv & broadband internet access, why not be done with Verizon forever?

Now we’ll have 1 bill to pay, and here’s hoping that their online management is better than Verizon’s — It can’t get much worse.

Weekend of the Sippy Cup

Friday, after a long week of work and another sucessful delivery, I met Presley and Tbone at the Sunset.

…where I knocked over a pint of Carlsberg on the table.

Saturday, I visited Presley at the diner, and reached for the paper.

…where I knocked my iced coffee into my lap.

Today, Monday, I came to work and grabbed a bagel and coffee.

…and, somehow when I reached for the doorknob, I dropped the coffee on the floor where it went all over the place.

Response from Presley:

ooooo baby. you need a sippy cup…

Fire Sale, Part I

Well, it turns out that we own too much stuff… so we’re trying to sell off some furniture in our Fire Sale.

Pictures are posted temporarily…

Web Standards

There’s been a lot of talk around the web recently about designing better web sites:

I’ve just spent a good chunk of my saturday working on this very site. Though it may look as nearly identical to yesterday’s Nedward, I’ve done some major overhauls “under the hood”.

  • Firstly, I’ve made a huge effort to more accurately separate structure from content. A lot of images are now specified in CSS, and stray <br />s rather than cluttering up the code.
  • I’ve improved the semantics of the site. Bye Bye <span class=”title”>Hello World</span><br/> … welcome back, <H1>,<H2>,<H3>
  • Unordered list bullets! What a nightmare it is to replace default bullets with custom images… a nice solution was to use our friend background:url

Having just finished reading Mr. Zeldman’s book on Web Standards, believe me, I’ve seen the light. It’s really a shift in thinking for a whole industry of people like me who designed and built websites in the 90s.

Actually, forget about the 90s– the project I work on now, (which is for a certain software maker located in a certain northwestern state), I routinely have to deal with and debug some of the ugliest proprietary IE code known to man. I almost feel I should apologize to this client for not fixing it for them. Sadly, that’s not what I get paid to do.

There is an elegance and beauty to coding with web standards. And Zeldman’s book is good not because it’s a total reference of all things CSS – it’s not — he assumes we all understand the basics of CSS. What’s most interesting about it is Zeldman’s explanation for why we didn’t code properly in the past, and why we must now.

I like Jason Kottke’s point that there are other considerations to designing good websites, such as good semantics and accessibility. I guess I’m heading in the right direction.

Dave Jr.

I am shocked. Anna points out that David Letterman is going to be a father.

I know it seems as if his cultural relevance has completely vanished in the past 7-8 years, but he is the guy who transformed Late Night TV. You look at The Daily Show, Conan, Rosie, and even The Man Show, and it’s impossible to imagine them existing without Dave, (never-mind that only Conan and Jon Stewart have even approached Dave’s brilliance).

And if the announcement isn’t reason enough to tune in tonight, Simon & Garfunkel are performing.