<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A New MoMA.org</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nedward.org/2009/03/06/new-momaorg/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nedward.org/2009/03/06/new-momaorg</link>
	<description>//nedward.org is the personal weblog of John Niedermeyer, an Editorial Designer at NYTimes.com, living in Brooklyn.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 14:37:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: John Niedermeyer</title>
		<link>http://nedward.org/2009/03/06/new-momaorg/comment-page-1#comment-2732</link>
		<dc:creator>John Niedermeyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 23:23:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nedward.org/?p=2731#comment-2732</guid>
		<description>Agreed - but I also think that with ajaxy stuff and CSS, this is a lot more akin to a desktop experience than a 90s site with framesets, graphical text and rudimentary DHTML menus.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed&thinsp;&#8211;&thinsp;but I also think that with ajaxy stuff and <span class="caps">CSS, </span>this is a lot more akin to a desktop experience than a 90s site with framesets, graphical text and rudimentary <span class="caps">DHTML </span>menus.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jyo</title>
		<link>http://nedward.org/2009/03/06/new-momaorg/comment-page-1#comment-2731</link>
		<dc:creator>jyo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 23:04:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nedward.org/?p=2731#comment-2731</guid>
		<description>Re: Navigation as framesets. I agree this is a good implementation of a static nav bar - but I wonder if that&#039;s more a fact that screen-resolution has made it more viable. Back in 1996, I wasn&#039;t willing to give up even 100 pixels to a fixed nav bar on a 800x600 (or, gasp, a 640x480) screen. Today, with average monitor heights in the thousands of pixels, 100 pixels is a much easier sell.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: Navigation as framesets. I agree this is a good implementation of a static nav bar&thinsp;&#8211;&thinsp;but I wonder if that&#8217;s more a fact that screen-resolution has made it more viable. Back in 1996, I wasn&#8217;t willing to give up even 100 pixels to a fixed nav bar on a 800&#215;600 (or, gasp, a 640&#215;480) screen. Today, with average monitor heights in the thousands of pixels, 100 pixels is a much easier sell.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
