Archive for the 'buffalo' Category

The Crash of Flight 3407

Flight 3407 – Reuters

CREDIT: Gary Wiepert, Reuters [via]

Last night, Con­ti­nen­tal Flight 3407 crashed in route from Newark to Buf­falo Nia­gara Inter­na­tional Air­port, just a few miles from its sched­uled des­ti­na­tion. The crash site is just five or six miles from where I grew up, in a suburb of Buf­falo, NY.

The Buf­falo News has a living topic page ded­i­cated to cov­er­age of the event, which they are updat­ing with arti­cles, photos, video and other resources, as they are put up. They also started live blog­ging the story, and link­ing to out­side resources pro­vided by cit­i­zen journalists.

CNN is car­ry­ing live video from the local NBC affliate.

My heart goes out to the vic­tims, their fam­i­lies and the nearby com­mu­ni­ties. It’s impor­tant to remem­ber that these things rarely happen, but when they do, espe­cially so close to home, it’s impos­si­ble not to feel sad.

Saving Buffalo’s Untold Beauty

Downtown Buffalo

Photo Credit: Tony Cenicola/The New York TimesA photo of downtown Buffalo.

The Times had a great piece yes­ter­day on Buffalo’s archi­tec­tural legacy, and recent attempts to save his­toric buildings:

Buf­falo is home to some of the great­est Amer­i­can archi­tec­ture of the late 19th and early 20th cen­turies, with major archi­tects like Henry Hobson Richard­son, Fred­er­ick Law Olm­sted, Louis Sul­li­van and Frank Lloyd Wright build­ing mar­vels here. Together they shaped one of the grand­est early visions of the demo­c­ra­tic Amer­i­can city.

Yet Buf­falo is more com­monly iden­ti­fied with the crum­bling infra­struc­ture, aban­doned homes and dwin­dling jobs that have defined the Rust Belt for the past 50 years. And for decades its archi­tec­ture has seemed strangely frozen in time.

There is also an accom­pa­ny­ing slide show, from which the photo above was taken.

Full dis­clo­sure: I’m orig­i­nally from Buffalo.

Google Earth in 3D

Google Earth now has 3D-buildings, and it’s really fun to play with. Here is the Times Build­ing, where I work:

Times Building

A 3D rendering of the New York Times Building in Midtown, as shown in Google Earth.

If you have Google Earth installed, see it for your­self. Or, try land­ing on the deck of the Golden Gate Bridge, (just zoom in).

There seems to be data for a lot of cities, includ­ing my home town of Buf­falo, and former home of Boston.

Sabres as Oasis?

Chris DruryWe’re head­ing home to Buf­falo for the hol­i­day, (and my 10-year High School reunion), which reminds me of how well the Sabres are playing.

ESPN’s John Buc­ci­gross com­pares the Sabres to the brit­pop Oasis of all things:

At full strength, the Buf­falo Sabres are unequiv­o­cally the best team in the NHL. Not only do they have the full com­ple­ment of parts, but Buf­falo has that con­fi­dence that Oasis had when they went head-to-head with Blur back in 1995 in a Brit­pop mano a mano, or more accu­rately called boyo-a-boyo.

Noel Gal­lagher said he and Oasis’ soul was more pure than Blur’s because they grew up poor, with dirt under­neath their fin­ger­nails, while Blur was middle class. The con­cept is inter­est­ing, espe­cially when it is spoken with a rough Eng­lish accent while sit­ting in a gigan­tic and expen­sive chair.

But Chris Drury, who grew up in a middle-​class town in south­ern Con­necti­cut, makes $3.1 mil­lion this season and prob­a­bly will sign a five-​year, $22 mil­lion con­tract with some­one next summer. And yet, he plays every game like some­one kid­napped his entire family and the ransom is win­ning the face­off he is about to take. That’s the story, morn­ing glory.

I may not agree with John’s take on the 90s Brit­pop war, but it’s hard to argue with his thoughts on Drury.

X-mas in Buffalo

Ornament on the familial X-mas tree

Ornament on the familial X-mas tree

Macy and Jeremy at Spot Coffee, Elmwood Ave.

Macy and Jeremy at Spot Coffee, Elmwood Ave

Exhibit at the Albright-Knox Art Gallery

Exhibit at the Albright-Knox Art Gallery

Con­tinue read­ing ‘X-mas in Buffalo’

Buffalo Central Terminal Update

Chuck Maley's Central Terminal picturesA while back, I posted about a piece of archi­tec­tural won­der­ment lying van­dal­ized and dor­mant in Buf­falo — the old Cen­tral Ter­mi­nal. It’s a beau­ti­ful Deco train sta­tion from the 1920s, plopped into an oth­er­wise unex­cep­tional sub­ur­ban neighborhood.

At the time the sta­tion was built, Buf­falo was still an indus­trial and cul­tural center, with a pop­u­la­tion over one-​half mil­lion. It was second only to Chicago for its tan­gling rail net­work. How­ever, by the late 1970s, both the city and the sta­tion had seen better days. The sta­tion was boarded up, and the trains instead stopped at a new, strip-​mall like parking-​lot sta­tion not far away.

Well, there is some good news… it seems that some people do care about pre­serv­ing the city’s her­itage. Despite its van­dal­ized and trashed inte­rior, the build­ing is draw­ing crowds — includ­ing some Cana­dian urban explorers.

What I love about struc­tures like the Cen­tral Ter­mi­nal is that they were built for the public to use. It’s absolutely unthink­able to imag­ine pri­vate cor­po­ra­tions build­ing such public spaces today — I think those years have passed, (as have the years of ridicu­lously cheap immi­grant labor).

Here’s hoping there is a devel­oper out there with deep pock­ets and a cre­ative will.

The Cen­tral Ter­mi­nal at a glance:

  • The Cen­tral Ter­mi­nal opened four months before the Wall Street crash of 1929
  • Designed to handle an antic­i­pated Buf­falo pop­u­la­tion of 1.5 mil­lion, it cost $14 mil­lion to build
  • The 17-story office tower stands 271 feet high
  • The sta­tion closed in Octo­ber 1979 after years of dwin­dling rail pas­sen­ger service
  • A 1969 study esti­mated it would cost $54 mil­lion to restore it for office use, and $16.3 mil­lion to demol­ish it

Basketcase City

Here is an inter­est­ing item in the Buf­falo News… it seems former mayor James D. “Jimmy” Grif­fin is start­ing a “grass-roots” cam­paign to recall his suc­ces­sor, Mayor Masiello. Just as Buf­falo is start­ing to do the right things it needs to do to get out of finan­cial chaos, past specters respon­si­ble for the mess the city finds itself in are in are resur­fac­ing to reassert their influence.

There is no money in the city cof­fers, and NY State is occu­pied with rebuild­ing NY City… yet Grif­fin finds it nec­es­sary to stir up pop­ulist anger at the mayor’s insis­tence that a city of 290,000 cannot afford 2-man police cars.

Now, I’m sup­port­ive of unions, and labor in gen­eral. But, they’ve got the city hijacked — it’s just not the city of half-​million that it was in 1905. My sub­ur­ban child­hood town, Amherst, prob­a­bly has more class-A office space that 10 Buffalos… the reign­ing cul­ture there is one of the automobile.

If You Build it, They Will Come
The State built the new campus of the Uni­ver­sity at Buf­falo — on unde­vel­oped land in Amherst in the 60s — in such a way as to con­fuse pedes­tri­ans. The park­ing lots and mega-steel-and-glass-box build­ings are on a scale unfath­omable to the pedes­trian. It could take you thirty min­utes to walk from the dor­mi­to­ries to class, and the only thing that sep­a­rates you are vast park­ing lots and curv­ing 8-lane roads. This sort of destruc­tive and unprece­dented plan­ning will make an ago­ra­phobe out of anyone that isn’t high on something… There is no urban fabric — you can’t com­fort­ably walk down a block and buy a coke at the news stand on the way to sta­tis­tics. The street isn’t lined with a buffer of parked cars or trees to insu­late the pedes­trian from the street. No. This would be the tra­di­tional way of plan­ning. Are the streets planned at all?

The fact is, the only way the Uni­ver­sity at Buf­falo makes any coher­ent sense is from 75 mph out your car window on Interstate-990, (inci­den­tally a use­less, sprawl-​inducing high­way built to link yet-to-be-built shoddy cul-de-sacs north of the city, to the new campus). And from a reac­tionary admin­is­tra­tive point of view, this kind of build­ing assures total con­trol over the “streets”, a worry of these types in the tur­bu­lent 1960s.

A Cul­ture of Dash­boards
Where was I? Oh yes. The auto­mo­bile. The Cul­ture in Buf­falo. It must be changed. Or at least mod­i­fied, and we’ve got to for once put an end to people like Jimmy Grif­fin. Irish politi­cians, gen­er­ally speak­ing, have a par­tic­u­lar knack for killing cities for their own per­sonal gain. In my mind, James D. Grif­fin was the most cor­rupt city mayor of the past 25 years, eclipsed recently only by Buddy Cianci in Prov­i­dence. His neigh­bor­hood cronies ran the city into the ground, going so far as to poison the man-​made lake in Delaware Park, by dump­ing chem­i­cals such that it wouldn’t freeze for ice-​skaters. No, Grif­fin is only inter­ested in taking care of his clan in South Buf­falo, and the whole damn rest of you can go fuck yourselves.

Speak­ing of his Irish clan, always mind­ful to under­line their white, and there­fore priv­i­leged status, the Irish politi­cians iden­tify status sym­bols that might hide the oth­er­wise sad state of the city. The car, and sub­ur­ban devel­op­ment in gen­eral, are pre­cisely their chosen sym­bols. They can’t nec­es­sar­ily move into a 4 bed-​room McMan­sion in Amherst, how­ever they can afford a five-​year old Chevy or Ford — and avoid taking the subway or, god-​forbid, the bus system (which are pri­mar­ily employed by the African-​American pop­u­la­tion). They envy the new sub­ur­ban, car-​oriented devel­op­ment of strip malls and park­ing lots, and politi­cian like Grif­fin decided that this was pre­cisely the kind of con­struc­tion needed in the city. What resulted, was a mess. Drive down main street from the 198 to down­town to see what i mean. You can lit­er­ally drive through there with­out seeing people on the street for blocks — and this is a 4-lane road

Cities should be orga­nized to facil­i­tate sub­ur­ban­ite com­muters. Right? Well, this kind of thing isn’t going to be sus­tain­able in Miami, Las Vegas, Philadel­phia or Detroit — much less Buf­falo. In fact, the finan­cial real­i­ties that are start­ing to sur­face in less-​off places like Buf­falo should be a kind of warn­ing. We won’t always have cheap oil, and it should be evi­dent that cities actu­ally offer a healthy way of life. Walk to work. Ride a subway car with people from dif­fer­ent clans than you. Pre­serve our his­tor­i­cal build­ings, because they were built better than any build­ing in the past 50 years.

The Restora­tion
Walk to work? These sort of ideas belong to elites, and that explains why the Irish politi­cians (and others like James Pitts, the African-​American Common Coun­cil Pres­i­dent), resist efforts in this direc­tion. They’re too caught up in what they per­ceive to be status sym­bols, i.e., cars, krispy kremes, that they don’t real­ize that the health of the city and region depends on the health of its neigh­bor­hoods. And, yes Mr. Pitts, we will have to invest in the minor­ity neigh­bor­hoods. But until we put some money in the cof­fers, and work on erod­ing the per­cep­tion that cities are for non-​car dri­ving public-​housing types. It’s a mania that cannot sus­tain itself.

<sports>


I really am tempted to write a Slate-like cranky crit­i­cism of the new Buf­falo Bills uni­forms, but I will try to say some nice things: The dark blue is great. I like the stripes with the gray on the helmet.

(Here comes the cranky part) So, if you’re going to make an “update” with the new darker blue, why would you keep the lighter royal blue? Wouldn’t it be nice to put the num­bers in red, or gray? or the new dark blue? Doesn’t that light blue look just as dated now as it did last year? Why do the white uni­forms have a blue bar on the shoulders?

And the logo — change the f*cking logo. I think the Sabres got the logo RIGHT. It’s tough, modern and looks fuck­ing great on the front of the uni­forms. The Bills logo (much like the orig­i­nal Sabres jer­seys) is the boring old abstract corporate-​art that is a direct rip-​off of that 1970s Buf­falo pro­pa­ganda “WE’RE TALK­ING PROUD”. Talk­ing Proud? We’re talk­ing MISERY.

Let me tell you what I really think. In a move true to this nos­tal­gic age we live in, the Bills tried to pre­serve many ele­ments of the old uni­forms, while updat­ing the colors a little. The result? It’s an inco­he­sive mish­mash of styles and colors, trying to be every­thing to every­body and it fails all around. There is noth­ing intim­i­dat­ing about these jer­seys, nor is there any­thing “new”.

Convert, don’t Build

Anyone fol­low­ing the Adel­phia bid to build a huge sky­scraper on the Buf­falo water­front, has to laugh at the company’s deter­mi­na­tion to get it done. The com­pany is having Enron-​like finan­cial woes, yet still wants to build this tower in a city that has com­mer­cial vacancy rates that rival occu­pancy rates. I’m not saying the Adel­phia project is a mis­take, how­ever I think people aren’t focus­ing prop­erly on how to foster the 24-hour down­town a vibrant city needs.

First, I think, you need to lure people who work in the city to also live in the city. Cities have cer­tain advan­tages to offer: A con­cen­tra­tion of local busi­nesses and ser­vices within walk­ing dis­tance (or by train), includ­ing restau­rants, arts and cul­tural offer­ings, and shops. Instead of infill­ing the city with suburban-​type devel­op­ments (main place mall), or huge gated res­i­den­tial projects, why not play off the strengths of city-​living, by revi­tal­iz­ing dense, mixed-​use neigh­bor­hoods, and pro­vide a hous­ing alter­na­tive for people?

I’ve been encour­aged to see, as I have pointed out in my blog, that devel­op­ers in Buf­falo are taking inter­est in con­vert­ing old com­mer­cial and indus­trial space into res­i­den­tial hous­ing (lofts.) It’s been shown to make money, and I think that might be the cat­a­lyst for a true down­town recov­ery. The kinds of people look­ing for this kind of hous­ing have been will­ing to pay upwards of $1000 for a one-​bedroom loft — (inci­den­tally, in boston that would be a bar­gain, but in buf­falo! My god, that’s no bargain) — so they must have money, and need ser­vices like gro­ceries, restau­rants, and bars. Presto!, urban renewal… You don’t need to throw cat­a­clysmic money into develp­ing a new sky­scraper, when the mar­ket­place can do you just as good.

Trains are better than Cars

buff-central-term-2.jpg
Cen­tral Sta­tion, Buf­falo, NY, circa 1930.

Presley’s sister Kelly was in town this past week­end, and she left yes­ter­day on the Amtrak train from Back Bay Sta­tion, which got me think­ing about train sta­tions and trains in gen­eral. Every­one in these New Urban­ist books that I read can’t fathom how Amer­ica ended up wedded to the auto­mo­bile, while the Euro­peans remain con­tented with trains.

I think it’s a simple answer: after the war, we just could. It was the thing to do, and we had the resources. But, isn’t there some­thing won­der­ful about trains? And more impor­tantly, big city train sta­tions? Grand Cen­tral in Man­hat­tan is gor­geous. Mod­erin­ists moan on about how style should be down-​played because it is the taste of eco­nomic elites, but I don’t care if putting a build­ing like that up was a cap­i­tal­ist show of wealth and power — it had beauty, craft­man­ship and it was a place where people of all races and incomes passed through. They destroyed Penn Sta­tion in the six­ties to put up Madi­son Square Garden. big whoop. If any­thing, MSG is more capitalist-​minded than the build­ing it replaced.

So, it brings me around to Buf­falo and Kelly’s departure… Ear­lier in this cen­tury, Buf­falo actu­ally was in the top 5 for most rail­road track — Buf­falo had indus­try, and it was located on the impor­tant route between new york and chicago. The city built some beau­ti­ful train sta­tions (sub­se­quently demol­ished), who’s archi­tec­ture seems won­der­fully as grand as Grand Cen­tral itself. The last remain­ing sta­tion, Cen­tral Ter­mi­nal, still stands on the East Side, though it’s falling apart. I wish to God the city could find some new use for the facil­ity — prob­lem is, it is located in the most eco­nom­i­cally depressed area of the city.

Boston as a Blueprint

The new Plan­ning news feed at the right of this page is already reap­ing inter­est­ing rewards — among the inter­est­ing links, an arti­cle that dis­cusses Boston and it’s neigh­bor­hoods. Mayor Menino has made neighborhood-​based com­mer­cial devel­op­ment a pri­or­ity over the past decade or so, and it’s just the kind of thing that makes eco­nomic sense. In award­ing grants to indi­vid­ual small busi­ness owners, (most of which is fed­eral money anyway), for little improve­ments such as new store facades, Boston has cul­ti­vated a neigh­bor­hood approach to devel­op­ment. Occa­sion­ally, big “urban-renewal” projects, such as the new Ritz-​Carlton mon­stros­ity in Chi­na­town, do get built, but usu­ally they include some kind of mixed-​use, (even if that mixed-​use is upscale in this very working-​class neighborhood).

It’s never been a very sexy thing to talk about, but the suc­cesses of this pro­gram can’t be ignored, and many cities are start­ing to emu­late Menino. Buf­falo is trying to cul­ti­vate this, through the cre­ation and encour­age­ment of city neigh­bor­hoods such as the “Pan-Am District” around Elm­wood Ave in North Buf­falo. Even pri­vate col­lege cam­puses such as Can­i­sius are con­tribut­ing to the qual­ity of their sur­round­ing neigh­bor­hoods by pro­vid­ing low-​interest mort­gages to pro­fes­sors and staff, to encour­age them to live near the schools. Now, answer me this: Why is the major state school, SUNY at Buf­falo, located in Amherst (not buffalo)?

What Buffalo Was, and What it Should Be